Home
  
Contact us
  
Feedback
  
Site map
  
Français    Português   

 SEARCH
Keywords:
Advanced search
 SUBSCRIBE
Your email address:

ANSA's 20 latest postings
 
Most popular postings on ANSA-Africa
 
 COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE
 
Affiliated Network for Social Accountability in East Asia and the Pacific (ANSA-EAP)
 
Affiliated Network for Social Accountability South Asia Region (ANSA-SAR)
 
GOXI - sharing in governance of extractive industries
 
IMAGE network - Independent Media for Accountability, Governance and Empowerment
 
ANSA-Africa is a project of the Economic Governance Programme, IDASA
 
  Publications
Political accountability in Africa: is the glass half-full or half-empty?
January 2010
Goran Hyden

Political accountability is a central theme on the international donor agenda. It figures prominently in governance projects and research sponsored by donors like DFID, USAID and Sida, and it features as one of the priority areas in the African Power and Politics Programme (APPP). Because of this prominent place in the minds of the donors, much of the effort, both in theory and practice has been devoted to assessing the progress that African countries have made towards an accountability system based on criteria drawn from a model of Western democracy. While many countries have made some progress in this regard, not the least with holding free and fair elections, governance assessments continue to highlight institutional shortcomings. On the scale offered by these assessments African countries, with a few exceptions, tend to occupy the bottom end. Using a metaphor, the glass tends always to be presented as half-empty, emphasizing what is missing, rather than being labeled half-full and thus conveying a message that progress has been made.

Turning this around is the key objective of the APPP. Finding out how Africans cope with governance challenges using their own wits and assessing the prospect that these patterns will lead to a shift toward better governance is its practical research agenda. This implies a focus on institutional diversity and varying outcomes rather than an assessment of a single institutional model expected to produce a preferred outcome, which is the way current mainstream approaches to governance in Africa work. It also implies a review of the key concepts and how they may be operationalized and used in obtaining relevant and valid empirical data. In short, it calls for a new way of studying political accountability in Africa.

This does not mean that the APPP starts from scratch. Its agenda builds on what others have said and done. Papers by David Booth (2008) and Staffan Lindberg (2009), the former trying to find a sufficiently strong and meaningful platform for all members of the consortium to work from, the latter laying the ground for how accountability may be approached in individual projects, have been important stepping-stones for preparing the empirical phase which members are now entering. This paper builds on these significant contributions while at the same time trying to add new insights into how political accountability of Members of Parliament may be better understood and studied.

The purpose of the paper is to discuss what an approach to political accountability that starts from the premise of ‘working with the grain’ in Africa would look like. It begins with a brief review of the concept of political accountability. The primary empirical material, admittedly limited in scope, is a series of interviews with MPs in Ghana in June 2009. The findings from these interviews are discussed in the light of what has been said about MP accountability elsewhere in Africa, especially in East Africa, thus providing a comparative perspective on the issues raised by the Ghanaian respondents. The paper then proceeds by highlighting the conceptual and methodological implications of the empirical findings before proposing the framework for a comparative study of MPs’ accountability that would include other African countries where such a study would add further insights of both theoretical and policy value. Its main conclusion is twofold: parties and party systems matter in any effort to strengthen the accountability of elected representatives in Africa. At the same time, however, these politicians must be allowed to make progress toward more effective institutions by being allowed to ‘live’ their own rules according to their own culture and habits rather than being prematurely forced into Western institutional straightjackets that frustrate rather than facilitate progress toward democracy.

* This report is one of the outputs of the Africa Power and Politics research project, based at the ODI in London. Readers can access the project website for further outputs. (http://www.institutions-africa.org/page/home)



Download document...
ANSA-Africa Thematic Areas
 NEWSFLASHES RSS
AfDB supports accountability in Tunisia
19 May 2011
AfDB

Tanzania doing poorly in civic education - APRM
19 May 2011
IPPMedia

Bill Gates speech to the World Health Assembly
19 May 2011
World Health Organisation

PM set to woo Africa with new trade deals to counter China's growing clout
19 May 2011
The Economic Times

The trouble with gender economics
19 May 2011
The Guardian

Denmark shines with financial aid policy
19 May 2011
IDN

Inside the alms trade
19 May 2011
The Age

DATA Report 2011: key findings
19 May 2011
ONE

ACP-EU MPs back ongoing democratic power-shifts in Africa and the Middle East
19 May 2011
European Parliament

CAADP: Mutual accountability framework
19 May 2011
AU-Nepad

more news
RSS Newsfeeds
 NEWSLETTER
ANSA-Africa Monthly Newsletter
 PROFILED LINKS
Evaluation Conclave 2010
Map Kibera
PG Exchange
Socio-Economic Rights & Acccountability Project
Women Deliver
More links

 INFORM US
Tell us about events relating to social accountability in the region
Home   |  Site map   |  Search   |  Disclaimer
ANSA-Africa is hosted by the Idasa
Octoplus Information Solutions