The Budgeting Process and the Implications on Social Policies and Poverty Reduction: Alternatives to Traditional Models (Draft)
July 2009
Cristina Bloj
United Nations Research Institute for Social Development
This paper analyzes the key aspects of the budget process, the
conditions and players necessary for its execution, and the different
management models that have evolved. It gives an overview of the
debates regarding the budget process and budgeting approaches, with
special focus on two alternative forms to traditional budgeting:
participatory budgeting and gender-sensitive budgeting. These
alternative forms of budgeting have brought local and regional
governments closer to the population, responding to a vision of
society and rights which stimulates citizens’ participation,
tolerance, the search for social contracts and basic consensus, the
design of integrated and coordinated social policies and transparency
in government management.
The author addresses the adoption of new public management modalities
within the framework of change in the State’s traditional role, as a
consequence of the policies and conditionalities imposed by
international financial institutions. By highlighting that this trend
has occurred together with the strengthening of the political and
territorial decentralization processes and the distribution of the
decision-making power to favour local and regional administrations,
the paper contextualizes the budget system’s core challenges to
support development, reform spending priorities, develop innovative
instruments, and define new alliances.
It concludes by emphasizing that these challenges require the
commitment and participation of the civil society as well as the best
tools for resource management, which can lead to greater transparency
and efficiency in both national and cooperation policies.
Note: Persons wanting to access this draft report must register on
the UNRISD website.
|