Home
  
Contact us
  
Feedback
  
Site map
  
Français    Português   

 SEARCH
Keywords:
Advanced search
 SUBSCRIBE
Your email address:

ANSA's 20 latest postings
 
Most popular postings on ANSA-Africa
 
 COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE
 
GOXI - sharing in governance of extractive industries
 
IMAGE network - Independent Media for Accountability, Governance and Empowerment
 
ANSA-Africa is a project of the Economic Governance Programme, IDASA
 
  Publications
The use of quantitative and qualitative survey results to influence policy: The case of Participatory Service Delivery (PSDA) in Zanzibar
November 2007

Q-squared, Centre For International Studies, University Of Toronto

When the Revolutionary Government of Zanzibar (RGOZ) was reviewing its first generation Zanzibar Poverty Reduction Plan (PRSP) in its Swahili acronym MKUZA, it was found out that its M&E could only track inputs, outputs, outcome and impact. Inputs are the resources that are needed to implement plan activities. Outputs include those achievements derived directly from the management of inputs. The activities that are implemented lead to activity output like the number of workshops conducted, the number of staff trained and so on. In turn, a series of activities outputs, if implemented correctly, should lead to some results or outcome. How the results are going to be achieved is reflected by the activities. In the long run, changes in outcome should lead to achieve the intended impact. However, to achieve the intended impact, the process should be implemented correctly. The current system of mid term evaluation and end of term evaluation miss a lot of opportunities within each year. Yearly resources committed are not seriously followed to see whether the resources and activities are actually in line with the intended outcomes. How then can the M&E system check that the annual activities are being implemented as desired and the resources are being rightfully used to reach the targets?

In this paper, the aim is to:

  • Inform that the ZSGRP has adopted the CRC as a yearly monitoring tool because developing country citizens need to develop a culture of evaluating the quality of services they receive.
  • Show how the results were taken on board by the government to institute cost sharing for water supply.
  • Advice how developing countries with second generation PRSPs can adopt the CRC in their wings at the sub national levels as a poverty monitoring tool that would assess the quality and value of services of different providers.


Download document...
Building Blocks of Social Accountability
Continental Shift in Social Accountability
 NEWSFLASHES RSS
Bishops ask South Africa to withdraw bill on state secrets
03 September 2010
CNS

State auditor touts "transparency website"
03 September 2010
The Tribune-Star

Oil operations attract Sh1 billion, but where is it?
03 September 2010
The New Vision

PSCBS moved to finance ministry
03 September 2010
PCSBS

Uganda’s commitment to democracy is encouraging
03 September 2010
Daily Monitor

ACC hails proposed Act
03 September 2010
The Times of Zambia

Global initiative gives Zambia tips in resource management
02 September 2010
The Times of Zambia

more news
RSS Newsfeeds
 NEWSLETTER
ANSA-Africa Monthly Newsletter
 PROFILED LINKS
Ghana Centre for Democratic Development
Open Forum for CSO Development Effectiveness
U4 Anti Corruption Resource Centre
Uwazi
social media in Africa
More links

 INFORM US
Tell us about events relating to social accountability in the region
Home   |  Search   |  Site map   |  Disclaimer
ANSA-Africa is hosted by the Idasa
Octoplus Information Solutions